Mathias v. Department of Revenue
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*52FADELEY, J.
Taxpayers complain that their fully developed, vacant residential subdivision lot was valued and taxed at higher amounts than identical lots adjacent to it in the same subdivision. Defendant Department of Revenue does not contest that taxpayers’ lot was valued for real property tax purposes at a substantially higher amount than the taxable valuation applied to adjacent lots, or to lots located elsewhere in the same subdivision, or to very similar lots in other nearby subdivisions within the boundaries of the same taxing authority. Instead, the department defends the dispariiy in…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Davis v. Michigan Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Allegheny Pittsburgh Coal Co. v. Commission of Webster Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Phillips Chemical Co. v. Dumas Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Williams v. VermontSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hughes v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- America West Airlines, Inc. v. Deparment of RevenueArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Board of Equalization v. Utah State Tax Commission Ex Rel. Benchmark, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1993
- Boise Cascade Corp. v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1991
- Knapp v. City of JacksonvilleOregon Supreme Court · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.