Legal Opinion

Mathias v. Department of Revenue

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 1991No. OTC 2910; SC S37159PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*52FADELEY, J.

Taxpayers complain that their fully developed, vacant residential subdivision lot was valued and taxed at higher amounts than identical lots adjacent to it in the same subdivision. Defendant Department of Revenue does not contest that taxpayers’ lot was valued for real property tax purposes at a substantially higher amount than the taxable valuation applied to adjacent lots, or to lots located elsewhere in the same subdivision, or to very similar lots in other nearby subdivisions within the boundaries of the same taxing authority. Instead, the department defends the dispariiy in…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Davis v. Michigan Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Allegheny Pittsburgh Coal Co. v. Commission of Webster Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Phillips Chemical Co. v. Dumas Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Williams v. VermontSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hughes v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. America West Airlines, Inc. v. Deparment of RevenueArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Board of Equalization v. Utah State Tax Commission Ex Rel. Benchmark, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Boise Cascade Corp. v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1991
  5. Knapp v. City of JacksonvilleOregon Supreme Court · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API