Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Gifford Sand & Gravel Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 3, 1928No. 3168PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOdom, J.

This suit is for compensation under Act No. 20 of 1914 and amendments, not including Act No. 85 of 1926.

Plaintiff, while at work for defendant, fell a distance of some six or eight feet, striking his head against a piece of iron which passed through the left ear and penetrated the skull in front óf and above the ear.

The brain itself was punctured and a small portion of the brain tissue escaped through the opening. Surgeons removed fragments of the skull and reunited the tissues. There was left in the skull a hole about the size of a fifty-cent piece. The outer skin has healed over the wound,…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Schneider v. Travelers Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. Hargis v. McWilliams Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. Harris v. Southern Carbon Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
  4. Wright v. Fuller Const. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Bailey v. Gifford Sand & Gravel Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API