Legal Opinion

Henderson v. Skerczak

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 27, 1969No. 5-5010PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lyle Brown, Justice.

Skerczak sued Henderson for personal injuries arising out of a vehicular collision. The jury found in Henderson’s favor. Twenty-four days after the jury returned its verdict, Skerczak filed a motion for new trial which was granted. Henderson appeals from that order, contending (1) the motion was filed out of time, and (2) there was no showing justifying a finding of unavoidable delay in filing the motion.

With, respect to the issue over the timely filing of the motion, Skerczak contends it was actually filed in time. Skerczak interprets the statute to mean fifteen days…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Big Rock Stone & Material Co. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  2. Ellsworth Bros. Truck Lines v. MayesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  3. City of Aurora v. PowellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  4. Schofield v. BakerDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1917

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Karam v. HalkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  2. Peek v. MeadorsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  3. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. OrsburnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API