Legal Opinion

White & Gleason v. City of Chicago

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1900PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Writ of Error to the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. Orrin 1ST. Carter, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Boggs

This writ of error brings in review the proceedings had in the county court óf Cook county under an ordinance passed by the city council of the city of Chicago providing for the curbing, grading and paving of Forty-fourth place from Oakenwald avenue to the Illinois'Central railroad, in said city, the cost to be paid by special assessments on the property benefited.

We think it must be held that it affirmatively appeared from the record, notices of the time at which confirmation of the assessment roll would be asked were not posted “in four public places,” as required by section 44 of the act…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Law v. GrommesIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  2. American Express Co. v. PinckneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Bradley v. DroneIllinois Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tennessee Drainage District v. MoyeIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Miller v. MowersIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Oulvey v. LittleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1924
  4. Beckett v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API