Legal Opinion

Martin v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 11, 1940No. 7 Div. 484PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICE, Judge.

The record presents but a single question. It will be stated in this way: Appellants were jointly indicted for a felony. They were jointly tried.

After the submission of the case to the jury the jury retired to the jury room; and after it had deliberated for some time it came back into open court to report its “verdict.”

After being asked by the court if it had reached a verdict one member of the jury handed to the Clerk the indictment, upon the back'of which was written the following “verdict:” “We the jury find the defendant Bud Martin guilty as charged in the indictment but we…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Buntin v. City of DanvilleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
  2. Kansas City M. & B. R. R. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  3. Meadows v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  4. Phœnix Insurance v. MoogSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  5. Driver v. PateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Hart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  3. Showers v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  4. Griffin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2000
  5. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API