Martin v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
RICE, Judge.
The record presents but a single question. It will be stated in this way: Appellants were jointly indicted for a felony. They were jointly tried.
After the submission of the case to the jury the jury retired to the jury room; and after it had deliberated for some time it came back into open court to report its “verdict.”
After being asked by the court if it had reached a verdict one member of the jury handed to the Clerk the indictment, upon the back'of which was written the following “verdict:” “We the jury find the defendant Bud Martin guilty as charged in the indictment but we…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Buntin v. City of DanvilleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
- Kansas City M. & B. R. R. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Meadows v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Phœnix Insurance v. MoogSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
- Driver v. PateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Ex Parte HartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Hart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
- Showers v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Griffin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2000
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.