Legal Opinion

Federated Mutual Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 24, 1996No. 2-95-0913PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hutchinson

Defendant, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm), appeals the trial court’s order granting summary judgment for plaintiff, Federated Mutual Insurance Company (Federated). State Farm contends that the trial court erred because active tender by an unschooled layperson is not necessary to trigger an insurer’s duty to defend when the insurer has actual notice of the suit. We reverse and remand.

On December 31, 1991, Federated issued an insurance policy to Whitney Volkswagen, Inc. (Whitney), a car dealer. The policy covered a fleet of automobiles that Whitney allowed its…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Wilkin Insulation Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. PeppersIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Espinoza v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Thornton v. PaulIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Conway v. Country Casualty Insurance Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Companies v. West American InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  2. West American Insurance v. Yorkville National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Schal Bovis, Inc. v. Casualty InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  4. Alcan United, Inc. v. West Bend Mutual InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  5. Illinois Founders Insurance v. BarnettAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API