Legal Opinion

King v. Haynes

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 15, 1880PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from Drew Circuit Court iu Chancery. Hon. T. E. Sorrells, Circuit Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtEakin, J.

On the fifth of August, 1872, complainant, Haynes, became surety for William P. Montague in a note to defendant King, for $741.88, due February 15, 1873, and to bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum after maturity. As a further security, complainant executed to King a mortgage of certain lands, with power of sale for the payment of the debt on default. It was well known to King that complainant executed the note and mortgage merely as surety for Montague, to enable him to borrow money.

Afterwards, Montague, without the knowledge or consent of his said surety, executed, and King…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sims v. EverettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  2. Thornton v. BowieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API