Legal Opinion

Foss v. Sherwood

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 6, 1932PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSlack, J.

The plaintiff seeks to recover the amount of two checks given by defendant to W. H. Isham October 29, 1929, one for $400 and the other for $500, and interest. Both checks are payable to the order of Isham, were indorsed by him, and duly became the property of the plaintiff. Bach check contains the provision, “Not to be cashed before Dec. 1, 1929.” The defendant claims, and her only defense is, that these checks were in effect paid by another check for $900 which she gave Isham December 4, 1929 (three days after the other became payable), which she eventually paid.

It appeared without dispute…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Luther Baker & Sons v. ShermanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1899
  2. Seviour's Admr. v. Rutland RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1914
  3. Sawyer v. PhaleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1860

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Everett's WillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
  2. Children's Store v. Cody Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  3. Butler, Admr. v. FavreauSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
  4. Zeno's Bakery, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
  5. Bucklin v. NarkwichSupreme Court of Vermont · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API