Legal Opinion

Blumberg v. Siegel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 29, 1982PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review a determination of the Board of Zoning Appeals of the Town of North Hempstead, which, after a hearing, granted respondent Triad’s application for a use variance, petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Murphy, J.), dated June 19, 1981, which dismissed the petition on the merits. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and petition granted to the extent that the determination is annulled and the matter is remitted to the respondent zoning board for further proceedings…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of Otto v. SteinhilberNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  2. Village Board v. JarroldNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Forrest v. EvershedNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  4. Matter of Otto v. SteinhilberNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  5. Stanley Park, Inc. v. DonovanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Blumberg v. Town of North HempsteadNew York Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Goldstein v. Board of Zoning AppealsNew York Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API