Legal Opinion

Hill v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided April 5, 1932No. 8 Div. 247PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

The indictment is in Code form and as has been repeatedly held is sufficient to charge the offense denounced by the statute. Brannon v. State, 16 Ala. App. 259, 76 So. 991; Collier v. State, 16 Ala. App. 425, 78 So. 419.

There was much illegal testimony in this case, but for some reason none of it was objected to, and no exceptions are reserved to its introduction. After conviction by a jury motion was made to set aside the verdict setting forth several grounds, but as to what action was taken on the motion does not appear from the bill of exceptions and no exception reserved to the action of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brannon v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Collier v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Grace v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1928

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Phipps v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API