Legal Opinion
Holmes v. Weissman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 10, 1998PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this medical malpractice action seeking damages for the failure of defendant, an obstetrician, to diagnose and treat a cancerous tumor in her right breast. The complaint alleges that, as a result of defendant’s failure to diagnose and treat the tumor from her first prenatal visit through her postpartum visit, she was required to undergo a modified radical mastectomy to remove the tumor. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict of no cause for action.
By failing to raise any issue during the trial…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Feldsberg v. NitschkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. EdneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Dannick v. County of OnondagaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re Heather J.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. EdmondsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Goff v. PaulAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Pavlak v. Dyer, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Pike County2003
- Duncan v. Mount St. Mary's Hospital of Niagara FallsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Higgins v. West 50th St. Associates, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- McGruder v. GrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999