Legal Opinion

Harlow Publishing Co. v. Walden

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 1, 1934No. 22107PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

This is an appeal from the district court of Love county. Harlow Publishing Company is plaintiff in error, and Asa E. Walden is defendant in error. The parties occupy the same relative position in this court as they occupied in the trial court, and will hereinafter be referred to as plaintiff and defendant.

Plaintiff commenced its action by filing its petition declaring on a promissory note, praying for judgment for the principal sum of $88.89 ; the sum of $48.49 interest, and $28 attorney’s fee. The petition is in all essential respects in regular form. The defendant’s answer is in the form…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Oakland Cemetery Ass'n of Lyons v. LakinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  2. Farmers' Bank of Roff v. NicholsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Tovera v. ParkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Colonial Jewelry Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Horton v. BirdsongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bredouw v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  2. In Re the Estate of FullertonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  3. American Perforating Co. v. Oklahoma State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  4. Sharp v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. Bredouw v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API