Legal Opinion
Powe v. State
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 10, 1986No. C5-86-41PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOZNIAK, Judge.
Appellant James Curtis Powe was convicted of criminal sexual conduct in the first and third degree in violation of Minn. Stat. § 609.342(e)(i) (1984) and Minn.Stat. § 609.344(b) (1984). Appellant claims: (1) the evidence was insufficient to convict him of the offenses; (2) he was deprived of his right of confrontation and a fair trial by the exclusion of evidence regarding the complainant’s sexual experience and the way she acted and projected herself in the community; (3) he was deprived of a fair trial by (a) admission of Spreigl evidence of a sexual assault against…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. KindemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- United States v. Abraham KastoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. StufflebeanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State v. AniSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jenkins v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. JarvisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- State v. MaurerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Garnett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.