Legal Opinion

Rainey v. Rainey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 1, 2011No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Frank Caruso, J.), entered November 16, 2009 in a postjudgment divorce action. The order, among other things, denied the motion of plaintiff for daycare arrears and attorney’s fees.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law and the facts by awarding plaintiff the amount of $4,416.20 in daycare arrears and vacating those parts of the order providing that defendant’s proceeds from the sale of the marital property are to be applied to the amount of child support owed and as modified the order…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of Dox v. TynonNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Gallousis v. GallousisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. Cook v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. Saylor v. SaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Leo v. LeoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  2. Leo v. LeoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. Matter of Onondaga County Dept. of Social Servs. v. Marcus N.D.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
  4. Rainey v. RaineyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API