Legal Opinion

Holloman v. Davis

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 14, 1953No. 166PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevin, C. J.

The ruling of Judge Williams that the mortgage and deed which Elsie Mae Holloman offered as evidence of her title to a one-half undivided interest in the lands described in the petition for partition were insufficient for this purpose, we think, should be upheld. The description in these instruments is insufficient to identify and make certain the land intended to be conveyed, nor is it sufficient to be aided by parol testimony to fit it to the two separate tracts of land described in the petition. The land is described in the deed to Sallie Holloman and in the petition as two separate and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. North Carolina Self Help Corp. v. BrinkleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  2. Powell v. MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Katz v. . DaughtreySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. Peel v. . CalaisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kidd v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Boswell v. BoswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Garrison v. BlakeneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Kelly v. KellySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. Boone v. PritchettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API