Legal Opinion
Endicott v. Bratzel
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided November 27, 1933PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.
Cornelia A. Davis died testate on the 17th day of May, 1932, leaving an estate of an appraised value of $150,000. The will was duly admitted to probate and S. M. Endicott, who prepared the will, was appointed as executor of the estate. The executor thereupon instituted this suit to obtain a construction of that part of the will which provides as follows:
“SEVENTH: The balance of my property, of whatever kind, whether personal, real or mixed, including bonds, mortgages, money, notes and choses in action, I bequeath to a trustee or trustees to be hereinafter named, the same to be converted into…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re John's WillOregon Supreme Court · 1896
- Raley v. Umatilla CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1887
- Wemme v. First Church of ChristOregon Supreme Court · 1924
- In re Estate of BeardWyoming Supreme Court · 1897
- Pennoyer v. WadhamsOregon Supreme Court · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Quick v. HayterOregon Supreme Court · 1950
- United States National Bank v. RhilanderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984