Legal Opinion

Endicott v. Bratzel

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

Cornelia A. Davis died testate on the 17th day of May, 1932, leaving an estate of an appraised value of $150,000. The will was duly admitted to probate and S. M. Endicott, who prepared the will, was appointed as executor of the estate. The executor thereupon instituted this suit to obtain a construction of that part of the will which provides as follows:

“SEVENTH: The balance of my property, of whatever kind, whether personal, real or mixed, including bonds, mortgages, money, notes and choses in action, I bequeath to a trustee or trustees to be hereinafter named, the same to be converted into…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re John's WillOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Raley v. Umatilla CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Wemme v. First Church of ChristOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  4. In re Estate of BeardWyoming Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Pennoyer v. WadhamsOregon Supreme Court · 1891

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Quick v. HayterOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  2. United States National Bank v. RhilanderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API