Kalish v. Smith

GRIMM, Presiding Judge.

In this jury tried case, client Walter Smith appeals from a $29,345.20 judgment in favor of attorney Ralph Kalish for attorney’s representation of client in trade name infringement litigation. We affirm.

Client raises two points on appeal. First, he alleges trial court error in submitting instruction number 6, an action on account verdict director based on MAI 26.03. He contends the trial court should have given his tendered instruction, based on MAI 26.-03, breach of contract.

In his second point, client alleges the trial court erred in prohibiting him from cross…