Stuart v. Union Pacific Railroad
Supreme Court of the United States
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE . EIGHTH CIRCUIT. The facts, which involve the title to certain portions of the right of way of the Kansas Pacific Railway How owned by the Union Pacific Railroad, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKenna
Suit to quiet title to the E. U2 of the N. W. 34* and the N. E. Ji of the S. W. M and the N. W. % of the S. E. M of Section 20, Township 38, Range 67 West, situated in the city and county of Denver (formerly in Arapahoe County), State of Colorado.
The suit was brought in the District Court of .the city and county of Denver against the Kansas Pacific Railway Company, the Colorado Eastern Railroad Company and the Union Pacific Railroad Company and removed on the petition of the latter company to the United'States Circuit Court for the District of Colorado, on the ground of a separable…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. TownsendSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. DunmeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Railroad Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Kindred v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Union Pacific Railroad v. Laramie Stock Yards Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. SteinkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Union Pacific Railroad v. SnowSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Nadeau v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Harlan v. SparksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.