Legal Opinion

Browdame v. Candura

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 31, 2006PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hurkin-Torres, J.), dated August 19, 2004, which granted the defendants’ separate motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against each of them on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motions are denied, and the complaint is reinstated.

*748The defendants failed to establish prima facie that the plaintiff did not sustain a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Toure v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Black v. RobinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. Junco v. RanziAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. Aronov v. LeybovichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Yashayev v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Caracci v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Iles v. JonatAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. Sullivan v. DawesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. Mondi v. KeahonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API