Legal Opinion

Plott v. Deason

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided September 9, 2005No. 2040001PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MURDOCK, Judge.

David W. Plott (“the father”) appeals from a judgment retroactively modifying his child-support obligation. We reverse and remand.

In 1994, Vickie Ray Deason (“the mother”) initiated a paternity proceeding against the father, which resulted in a determination of paternity and an award of child support to the mother. In 2000, the Alabama Department of Human Resources (“DHR”) filed a petition on behalf of the mother seeking an increase in the father’s child-support obligation. In March 2000, after an evidentiary hearing in which the mother participated, the trial court entered a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Perryman v. HarbinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  2. Travis-Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Michael Wayne Howell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API