Legal Opinion

Roy Miller and Artie Miller v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 3, 1975No. 73--2819PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before WALLACE and SNEED, Circuit Judges, and MILLER, * Judge. SNEED, Circuit Judge:

This is an appeal from a Tax Court decision which held the taxpayers, Roy and Artie Miller, not liable for the deficiency asserted by the Commissioner in his Notice of Deficiency of August 31, 1970, pertaining to the taxpayers’ return for the calendar year 1967. The essence of this case best can be revealed by quoting from the Commissioner’s Notice. Its Explanation of Adjustments reads:

Since you own more than 80% in value of the stock of both corporations, it is. determined that the sale of equipment in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McWilliams v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Calvin D. Mitchell and Fay Bond Mitchell v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
  3. 10-42 Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971
  4. United States v. S. L. Rothenberg and Helen RothenbergCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Yamamoto v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980
  2. Scully v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  3. Scully v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  4. Demkowicz v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1975
  5. Yamamoto v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API