Hamilton v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion ok the Court by
Drury, Commissioner—
Affirming.
Bill Hamilton was indicted under section 1166, Kentucky Statutes, for shooting and wounding with intent to kill. He was found guilty and his punishment fixed at one year in the penitentiary.
He has alleged six grounds for reversal. The first and fifth grounds are misconduct of the employed counsel for the commonwealth in his opening statement to the jury and in his closing argument. This misconduct has not been embodied in the bill of exceptions, and under the rule which we have often announced, we cannot consider it. Our reasons for the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hopkins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
- McCorkle v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
3Cited by8 opinions
- Shelton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
- Carter v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
- Chism v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
- Tussey v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- Bates v. HindsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.