State v. Gurganious
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
GEER, Judge.
Defendant Franklin Allen Gurganious appeals from his conviction on three counts of committing indecent liberties. He primarily argues on appeal (1) that his trial attorney provided ineffective assistance of counsel in not moving to sever the charges and (2) that testimony of the State's rebuttal witnesses that defendant had inappropriately touched them should have been excluded. After reviewing the record, we can find that the trial court was not required to sever the charges and, therefore, hold that trial counsel did not provide ineffective assistance of counsel in failing to…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. BraswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. GolphinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. CallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- State v. LocklearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.