Legal Opinion
Croley v. Matson Navigation Co.
District Court, S.D. Alabama
Decided June 30, 1969No. Civ. A. Nos. 4016-66, 4017-66PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BY DEFENDANT MATSON NAVIGATION COMPANY
OPINION
DANIEL HOLCOMBE THOMAS, Chief Judge.
These two cases are presently before the Court on the Defendant Matson Navigation Company’s Motions for Summary Judgment filed in each case on December 23, 1968. Summary judgment is sought by the Defendant Matson but not by the Defendant Eureka. Matson initially moved for a summary judgment in each case on May 31, 1967, pursuant to Rule *55756 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The motions were subsequently amended, and as finally presented to the Court were based on the pleadings,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Delhi-Taylor Oil Corporation v. HenryTexas Supreme Court · 1967
- Littlehale v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Gulf Oil Corporation v. Kenneth C. BivinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- Crawford Johnson & Co. v. DuffnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
- Bessie L. Harvey v. The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Vera Croley, Etc. v. Matson Navigation Company, David E. Bouler v. Matson Navigation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971