Legal Opinion

Wallace v. Armstrong

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 13, 1925No. Gen. No. 29,797PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matchett

This appeal is by the defendant, and the question argued in the briefs is the sufficiency of a second affidavit of merits to an amended statement of claim, which affidavit was stricken by order of the court. Default for want of an affidavit was then entered, evidence heard, and the finding and judgment for plaintiff to the amount of her claim was entered.

The stricken affidavit is not preserved by bill of exceptions or other method provided by the statute. It does not appear from the record whether the court, in striking it, passed upon the question of its sufficiency as a matter of law, and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Parmelee v. LawrenceIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Lawrence v. BeecherIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Winslow v. LelandIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Mann v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Harmon v. CallahanIllinois Supreme Court · 1918

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hulke v. International Manufacturing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1957
  2. Van Meter v. GurneyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1929
  3. Rice v. BarkmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API