United States v. Ortiz-Gomez
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OWEN, Circuit Judge:
Carlos Ortiz-Gomez appeals his sentence, contending that his prior conviction under Pennsylvania law for a terroristic threat was not a crime of violence within the meaning of the federal Sentencing Guidelines. We vacate and remand for resentencing.
I
Ortiz-Gomez was convicted in Pennsylvania of making a terroristic threat in violation of title 18 Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes § 2706(a). Following this conviction and resulting incarceration, he was removed from York, Pennsylvania, to Mexico, and days later, in October 2007, he was apprehended in Texas. He pleaded guilty…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- James v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Gonzales v. Duenas-AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. Thomas Faulls, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Wayland HinkleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Jesus Torres-MiguelCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Curtis HowellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Gregory BrownCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.