Legal Opinion

Petrosino v. Bravo Volunteer Ambulance Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 19, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We reject plaintiffs contention that the admission into evidence of a transcript of an alleged tape recording made by a defibrillator machine requires reversal. Although the trial court erred in admitting the transcript, the error was harmless. Plaintiff merely speculates that the incriminating remark about the absence of oxygen allegedly made by defendant Kennedy occurred while the recording device was operating and might have been picked up by the machine. Since there was no reason for the jury to believe that the remark necessarily would have been recorded, the absence of a reference to it…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cotter v. ManhattanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Newman v. VetranoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Matter of HassineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API