Legal Opinion

Tingler v. Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided February 18, 2025No. 1:25-cv-00064Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION CHARLES TINGLER, Case No. 1:25-cv-64 Plaintiff, McFarland, J. vs. Litkovitz, M.J. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, ORDER Defendant. Plaintiff, a resident of Defiance, Ohio, has filed a pro se civil complaint against the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) seeking the immediate issuance of a $600.00 refund check promised by the IRS. (Doc. 1-1 at PAGEID 21, 22). In a case seeking a tax refund under 28 U.S.C. § 1346, the United States, and not the IRS, is the proper defendant. See Nix El v. Internal Revenue Serv.,

233 F. Supp. 3d 65, 67

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Charles C. Scott and Adeline E. Scott v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
  2. Nix El v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  3. Ciccotelli v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API