Legal Opinion

Russell v. Union Machinery & Supply Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1918No. 14193Published

Appeal from an order of the superior court for Snohomish county, Bell, J., entered December 19, 1916, denying a motion to vacate a judgment, after a hearing before the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the lower court denying a motion to set aside a judgment.

The facts may he briefly stated as follows: In November, 1916, the respondent brought an action against the appellant alleging that, prior to January 20, 1916, the respondent was the owner, and in possession, of a donkey engine of the value of $1,400; that, on that day, the appellant unlawfully and wrongfully converted the engine to its own use, and prayed for a judgment for its value. Thereafter the appellant filed an answer which, after general denials, alleged two affirmative defenses to the effect…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chehalis Coal Co. v. LaisureWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Willlams v. BreenWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Russell v. Union Machinery & Supply Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API