Deich v. American Discount Co.

Nichols, Judge.

The defendant in error has made a motion to dismiss the writ of error because of numerous “changes” in the judge’s certificate on the bill of exceptions. These changes involve the date of tender as well as the date of certification. Each change was made in pen and ink, and under the decisions in the cases of Crawford v. Cook, 48 Ga. App. 456 (1) (173 SE 187); and Fairfax Loan &c. Co. v. Turner, 49 Ga. App. 300 (2) (175 SE 267), where the dates last shown were within the time provided for such tender and certification, the remedy of the defendant in error, if such changes were…