Legal Opinion

Washington Water Power Co. v. Waters

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Idaho

Decided September 1, 1910PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Complaint by the Washington Water Power Company against Charles Waters and others to condemn land for the flowage of Coeur d’Alene Rake incident to the construction of an electric power plant. On demurrer to plaintiff’s third amended complaint.

1Opinion of the Court

DIETRICH, District Judge.

The defendant’s demurrer to the amended complaint herein was submitted orally at the May term, and at that time the view was intimated that, with the exception of certain objections bearing upon the question of federal jurisdiction, it would be overruled. In the third amended complaint to which the demurrer is now submitted, the jurisdictional defects seem to have been cured, and upon further reflection and consideration I am still inclined to hold to the opinion that in other respects the objections are not well taken, and that, therefore, the jurisdictional facts…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Spratt v. Helena Power Transmission Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Portneuf Irrigating Co. v. BudgeIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Hollister v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Potlatch Lumber Co. v. PetersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Helena Power Transmission Co. v. SprattMontana Supreme Court · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Nichols v. Central Virginia Power Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1925
  3. Bassett v. SwensonIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Blackwell Lumber Co. v. Empire Mill Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1916
  5. State Tax Commission v. Petroleum ExplorationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API