Legal Opinion

Kondos v. Mouser

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 10, 1917No. 8098PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from County Court, Creek County; Vick S. Decker, Ji^dge. Action toy Geo. H. Mouser against Theo. Kondos and another. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtOwen, J.

'An action of contract for services rendered. From the evidence it appeared that plaintiff, defendant in error here, acting as middleman, and not as agent of either party, brought together the defendants, plaintiffs in error here, and another party, the former a seller and the latter a buyer, in consequence of which meeting a contract of sale of a certain restaurant was entered into between them; that plaintiff had made an agreement with defendants that in case a sale was effected he was to receive a certain commission. Defendants alleged that the conduct of the plaintiff in concealing from…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Roxana Petroleum Co. v. GoldrickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. In Re Estate of LawrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Storrie Coal Co. v. McAlester Fuel Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API