Legal Opinion

Scott v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1976No. 46777PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

326 So.2d 165 (1976)

William Arthur SCOTT, Petitioner,

v.

The STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 46777.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January 15, 1976.

Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender, and Steven Rappaport, Asst. Public Defender, for petitioner.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Margarita Esquiroz, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

MUSZYNSKI, Circuit Judge.

This cause is here on petition for writ of certiorari supported by certificate of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, that its decision (Scott v. State, 305 So.2d 289) is one which involves a question of great public interest. See Fla.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Nelson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  4. Zirin v. Charles Pfizer & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1961
  5. Scott v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Poore v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  2. State v. PayneSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  3. State v. SegarraSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  4. State v. WayneSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  5. Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API