Legal Opinion

Penepent Corp. v. Penepent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 12, 1991No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

— Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted defendants leave to serve a second amended answer, but abused its discretion in imposing *621sanctions, costs, disbursements and attorney’s fees as a condition (see, Menne Nursery Corp. v Rebco Steel Corp., 73 AD2d 1059). The proposed pleading will not cause plaintiffs significant prejudice or expense and was interposed within a reasonable time upon the advice of substituted counsel. The court properly denied, without prejudice, plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Menne Nursery Corp. v. Rebco Steel Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Penepent Corp. v. PenepentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API