Legal Opinion

Edward v. Sentinel Manangement Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 6, 2000No. C1-99-1851PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HALBROOKS, Judge

As a term of the settlement of Ms claim for workers’ compensation benefits, relator was required to quit his employment. After applying for reemployment benefits, the commissioner’s representative determined that relator quit without good reason caused by employer, disqualifying him from receiving benefits. On appeal, relator contends that he was required to terminate Ms employment to obtain a settlement, constituting good reason to quit his employment. Because relator had the option of remaining employed and continuing to pursue his workers’ compensation claim, we hold…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. White v. Metropolitan Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Ress v. Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Ferguson v. Department of Employment ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. Kehoe v. Minnesota Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  5. Larson v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wittig v. Allianz, A.G.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Charles Lambert Bey, Relator v. W.W. Johnson Meat Co., Inc., Department of Employment and Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API