Legal Opinion

State v. Cieslik

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided December 2, 1980No. 7733PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,.

This is an appeal from a conviction for speeding under Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 291C-101. For the reasons stated herein, we reverse.

The issue before us is whether the evidence presented was sufficient to support a conviction under the stated statutory charge. We hold it was not.

Appellant was clocked by radar and issued a traffic citation on June 9,1979 charging him with speeding in violation of HRS § 291C-101, which provides as follows:

291C-101 Basic Rule. No person shall drive a vehicle at a speed greater than is reasonable and prudent under the conditions and having…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. HernandezHawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. KahalewaiHawaii Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State v. LaneHawaii Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. CarlsonDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1989
  2. State v. SanchezHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. State v. MinerHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API