State v. Cieslik
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,.
This is an appeal from a conviction for speeding under Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 291C-101. For the reasons stated herein, we reverse.
The issue before us is whether the evidence presented was sufficient to support a conviction under the stated statutory charge. We hold it was not.
Appellant was clocked by radar and issued a traffic citation on June 9,1979 charging him with speeding in violation of HRS § 291C-101, which provides as follows:
291C-101 Basic Rule. No person shall drive a vehicle at a speed greater than is reasonable and prudent under the conditions and having…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. HernandezHawaii Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. KahalewaiHawaii Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. LaneHawaii Supreme Court · 1976
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. CarlsonDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1989
- State v. SanchezHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1981
- State v. MinerHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1981