Mutart v. Allstate Insurance Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
ARMSTRONG, Judge.
This is a pedestrian-car collision case. The plaintiff pedestrian, Louis Mutart, Jr., appeals an adverse jury verdict which found the driver of the car, Kathleen Nes-bitt, not to have been negligent. We find that the jury’s decision was not manifestly erroneous or clearly wrong, that the trial court’s instructions to the jury contains no reversible error and that there was no reversible error in the trial procedure. Accordingly, we affirm.
At the time of the accident, Mutart was employed as an exterminator. He had parked his employer’s truck on the side of Constance Street…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Watson v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
- Baumgartner v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
- Turner v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
- Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co. v. NeroSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Regis v. Department of PoliceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
- Arceneaux v. WallisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
- Estate of Hickerson v. ZimmermanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
- Duroncelet v. McLendonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2001