Republic Power & Service Co. v. Gus Blass Co.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, J.,
(after stating the facts). It is well settled that the only limitation upon the power- of the State to exact conditions upon which foreign corporations may transact business within its borders is where such corporations are engaged in interstate commerce, and that this limitation arises only because the Federal Constitution has committed to Congress the power to regulate commerce between the States. Kansas City Structural Steel Co. v. State, 161 Ark. 483; Browning v. Waycross, 233 U. S. 16, and Mitchell Furniture Co. v. Selden Brack Construction Co., 257 U. S. 282.
' Our statutes…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dahnke-Walker Milling Co. v. BondurantSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Browning v. City of WaycrossSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Tallman v. LewisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
- Carter v. Bradley County Road Improvement Districts 1 & 2Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
- Carey v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ark. Airmotive Division of Currey Aerial Sprayers, Inc. v. Arkansas Aviation Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
- City of Damascus v. BivensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- Pellerin Laundry MacHinery Sales Company v. HogueDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1963
- Brace v. Gauger-Korsmo Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
- Hicks Body Company, Inc., a Corporation v. Ward Body Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.