Legal Opinion

Krassner v. Veneman

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 31, 1962No. Civ. 10437PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

This is a judgment-roll appeal, by plaintiff and cross-defendant, Mildred E. Krassner, from a judgment quieting title to a parcel of San Joaquin County-real prop erty in defendants and cross-complainants S. Travaille and S. E. Yanderveen, as copartners (hereinafter called the “copartners”).

Plaintiff had been the holder of a deed of trust made by Gilbert J. Behlen and Lena Y. Behlen, his wife. Plaintiff’s claim is by reason of a trustee’s deed dated December 22, 1959, on foreclosure of this deed of trust.

The copartners claim under a certificate of sale and a later deed from the United States…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Corbett v. NuttSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Sparks v. FarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1902
  3. Sutter-Yuba Investment Co. v. WasteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Quinn v. KenneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Peterson v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Babb v. FrankDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1996
  2. Herrington v. WeigelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API