Legal Opinion

Hubert v. Traeder

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1905No. Docket No. 18PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; Donovan J. Bill by Louisa Hubert against Anthony Traeder and Mary Traeder to set aside a deed. From a decree for complainant, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

Louisa Hubert, a woman of advanced years, and relict of Edward Hubert, filed the bill in this cause to cancel a deed whereby she conveyed the premises in controversy to Anthony Traeder. It is undisputed that this deed was executed in the office of Traeder’s attorney, and it is claimed by the defendants that it was in settlement of then pending litigation between the parties, involving their respective claims to the premises. The complainant asserts that the deed was procured through fraud. The circuit court granted the prayer of the bill, and the defendants (husband and wife) have appealed.

Tra…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Long v. EarleMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Mettetal v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Bailey v. GroverMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Webber v. WebberMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  5. McLean v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API