Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Local 99, ILGWU, AFL-CIO & Clarise Sportswear Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1964Published

1Opinion of the CourtArthur G. Klein, J.

Motion for an order quashing or modifying a subpoena issued by the petitioner’s attorney in the arbitration proceeding, is disposed of as follows: the petitioner union entered into a collective bargaining agreement with the respondent manufacturing company, whereby working conditions, rates of pay, etc., were feed. The agreement provided inter alia for arbitration of ‘ ‘ any dispute or difference * * * between the Employer and the Union as to the meaning, application, performance or operation of any provisions of this agreement A dispute did arise between the parties concerning alleged…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sightmaster Corp. v. BurtNew York Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API