Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Maffett

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 28, 1927No. 17356PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. Where one’s duty requires him to act as hostler and to take an engine from the roundhouse through the railroad yards and leave it upon a track in readiness to be taken charge of by an engineer and used for'the purpose of drawing a train of ears from this State into another State, and where his duty also requires him, after so doing, to return by foot through the yards across the tracks to the roundhouse for tlie purpose of receiving further orders, both the act of taking out the engine and depositing it where required, for the purpose of being used in interstate commerce, and the act of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad Company v. WinfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Erie Railroad v. WelshSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Powell v. Augusta & Summerville RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  4. Betts Co. v. HancockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  5. Atlanta Street Railroad v. JacobsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Candler v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  2. Collins v. McPhersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  3. Jackson v. Camp & Brown Produce Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  4. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. DobbsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
  5. Georgia Power Co. v. WoodallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API