Legal Opinion
People ex rel. Fulmer v. Scully
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 1, 1985PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*672Respondent violated 7 NYCRR 251-5.1 by failing to commence a superintendent’s hearing within seven days of petitioner’s initial confinement to his cell. Moreover, petitioner’s due process rights were violated by respondent’s failure to provide him with a transcript of the superintendent’s hearing (see, Matter of Crudo v Fogg, 69 AD2d 902; Matter of Hurley v Ward, 61 AD2d 881; Matter of Walls v Scully, 121 Misc 2d 698; Matter of Lozada v Scully, 108 AD2d 859). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lozada v. ScullyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Hurley v. WardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Crudo v. FoggAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Walls v. ScullyNew York Supreme Court · 1983
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jackson v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Brito v. SullivanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Hawkins v. ScullyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Wysinger v. ScullyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Johnson v. ScullyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989