Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Robinson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 27, 1970No. 7028SC155PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtVaughN, J.

Every motor vehicle, when operated upon the highway shall be equipped with brakes that are maintained in good working order and conform to the regulations prescribed by statute. G.S. 20-124; Austin v. Austin, 252 N.C. 283, 113 S.E. 2d 553. Plaintiff’s evidence was clearly sufficient to show that, at the time of the accident, the brakes on defendant Jenkins’ automobile were defective and did not meet the requirements of this statute. Where the plaintiff has shown the defendant’s brakes to be defective, which is negligence per se, our Supreme Court has stated the correct rule to be as follows:

“T…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Conley Ex Rel. Conley v. Pearce-Young-Angel Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  2. Taylor v. . StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  3. Egan Chevrolet Co. v. BrunerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
  4. Wilson Ex Rel. Wilson v. ShumateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  5. Jones v. Raney Chevrolet Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Evans v. RobersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API