Legal Opinion
Pruitt v. Carpenters' Local Union No. 225 of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided February 6, 1990No. Nos. 88-8548, 88-8642PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ATKINS, Senior District Judge:
These two actions were brought by a union member for violation of Title I of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959 (LMRDA), 29 U.S.C. § 401 et seq. (“Pruitt /”), and for fraud and wrongful refusal to instate (“Pruitt II”). The district court in each case granted summary judgment in favor of the appel-lees, and the appellant appealed. For the reasons set forth below, we now affirm the ruling in Pruitt I and vacate the ruling in Pruitt II, 659 F.Supp. 1511, and remand that case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
I
Facts and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- J.W. Pruitt, Jr. v. Carpenters' Local Union No. 225 of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, J.W. Pruitt, Jr. v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Edward L. McGuffee in His Representative Capacity, and Carpenters' Local Union No. 225 of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990