Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court 1
481 U.S. 787 (1987)
YOUNG
v.
UNITED STATES EX REL. VUITTON ET FILS S. A. ET AL.
No. 85-1329.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued January 13, 1987
Decided May 26, 1987[*]
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
James A. Cohen argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Leonard J. Comden and William Weininger.
Deputy Solicitor General Bryson argued the cause for the United States as amicus curiae urging reversal. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Fried, Assistant Attorney General Trott, Edwin S. Kneedler, and Gloria C. Phares.
J. Joseph…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Brennan; Concurrence; Concurring in the judgment; Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent.
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Atrium Payroll Services, LLC v. PA Event and Broadcasting ServiceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2023