Legal Opinion

Brunner v. Brown

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 22, 1992No. 91-15PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARSON, Justice.

John Wermuth’s will was challenged by family members on the ground that Wer-muth lacked sufficient testamentary capacity. The trial court rejected these arguments, and the contestants appealed. Their sole complaint on appeal is that the court erred in refusing to allow their expert witness, during direct examination, to relate hearsay evidence that he had considered in forming his opinion on the decedent’s mental state. We conclude that, while such evidence is admissible under Iowa Rules of Evidence 703 and 705, the district court did not abuse its discretion in rejecting it…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. AndersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Lewis v. Rego Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  3. Rhozier T. Brown, Jr. v. United States of America, John D. Irby v. United States of America, Robert L. Jones v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  4. United States v. Larry Eugene McCollumCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  5. Michael D. Fox v. Taylor Diving & Salvage CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Tabieros v. Clark Equipment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Gacke v. Pork Xtra, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  3. In RE the Detention of Jonathan Edwin Stenzel Jonathan Edwin StenzelSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  4. Hutchison v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  5. State v. WeaverSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API