McKown v. Board of Supervisors
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentMcDERMOTT, Justice
I dissent. The issue crucial to the instant appeal is whether a mobilehome park is a legitimate and recognized use for which a place must be provided in all zoning ordinances. Although the term “mobilehome park” is defined in the Municipalities Planning Code,1 and the Commonwealth Court has accepted mobilehome parks as a legitimate use, this Court has not heretofore addressed the issue.2
I am of the opinion that the issue presented is of such importance and capable of recurrence that it should not be addressed by a mere per curiam affirmance.
The Commonwealth Court in the seminal case of East…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- East Pikeland Twp. v. Bush Bros., Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Appeal of Geiger v. Zoning Hearing BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Borough of Malvern v. JacksonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- In Re Appeal of ShoreCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987