Legal Opinion
Filaski-Fitzgerald v. Town of Huntington
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 16, 2005PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Molía, J.), dated *604October 10, 2003, as granted the motion of the defendant Town of Huntington for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Huntington Town Code, article V, § 173-18, requires that prior written notice of a sidewalk or street condition be given to the Huntington Town Clerk or Superintendent of Highways…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Amabile v. City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Corey v. Town of HuntingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Zawacki v. Town of North HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Galante v. Village of Sea CliffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Gillan v. Town of ClarkstownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3Cited by20 opinions
- Forbes v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Lopez v. G&J Rudolph Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Cendales v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Hanover Insurance v. Town of PawlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Delgado v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.