Eddy v. Loyd
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Garland Circuit Cfourt; William H. Rvans, Judge; 1. The alleged lien is fatally defective for want of a particular description of the property sought to be charged.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Garland Circuit Cfourt; William H. Rvans, Judge; 1. The alleged lien is fatally defective for want of a particular description of the property sought to be charged. The description is no description at all — too indefinite. 2. Kirby’s Dig., § 4976, was not complied with. 3. The claim was not properly verified. 4. The lien was waived by taking notes. 1. A note is only a promise to pay, not a payment. 63 Ark. 367. 2. The description is sufficient. 3. The Children’s Home, or Association, was not a party to the contract, and the notice required by law was not given. Kirby’s Digest, §…
1Opinion of the CourtMcCuuuoch, C. J.
The plaintiffs, J. R. Doyd and J. T. Jodd, as partners composing the firm of Doyd & Company, instituted this action in the circuit court of Garland County against Ida M. Eddy, as executrix of the estate of B. W. Eddy, deceased, and the Children’s Home & Girls’ Protective Association, a corporation, to recover judgment against the estate of said decedent for the price of building material furnished to him by plaintiffs m his lifetime and used in the construction of a building on a lot in the city of Hot Springs, and to enforce the statutory lien on said lot and building. The amount claimed is…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Meek v. ParkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1897
3Cited by18 opinions
- William M. Graham Oil & Gas Co. v. Oil Well Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Keffer v. StuartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
- Davenport v. DavenportSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
- Wilkerson v. EadsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
- Blose v. Havre Oil & Gas Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1934
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.